Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Prop 102: Marriage amendment to state constitution

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Proposition 102 is once again on the November ballot aiming at making a change to the constitution of Arizona.

In 2006, the proposition was rejected by Arizona voters and now the proposition has been siphoned down and is only 20 words long.

If approved by voters, it will set in the constitution in stone that only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state.

Yuman John Abarca, supporter of the one-man/one-woman marriage, says the proposition speaks for itself and the reason he supports it is because he considers marriage a timeless truce that is between one man and one woman.

"It's basically 20 simple words that really speak for themselves. It does one thing only and it places that definition of one man and one woman in the constitution and preserves that," Abarca said.

But with the current statute in place that already contains the one-man/one-woman definition, he says he feels that the statute can be challenged by politicians or judges.

Michael Baughman of Yuma voted against the proposition back in 2006 and says he will do so again. Baughman argues that there is no reason to make that constitutional amendment because Arizona already has a statute in place that recognizes a marriage between a man and woman.

"That's an unnecessary thing to do to try to put that into the constitution," Baughman said. "They're a very small group of people that just can't let go so they want to get into the constitution to make this a big deal."

But Abarca says they do need that constitutional guarantee. A judge or a politician could still challenge the statute, deem it as unconstitutional like it once happened in California last year, and simply redefine marriage for all of Arizonans, he said.

"By placing it in the constitution, what it does is prevents politicians and judges from being the ones that will make that ultimate decision," Abarca said. "It leaves the decision to the people, to the voters, where it really needs (to be)."

Baughman argues that supporters of the one-man/one-woman proposition should instead redirect their focus and funding onto issues of importance such as health care, immigration, energy policy or the economy.

"Like I said, Arizonans already made their views known on this issue of marriage," Baughman said.

---
Stephanie Sanchez can be reached at ssanchez@yumasun.com or 539-6847.


See archived 'Election News' Stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


Jobs
Cars
Real Estate
Rentals
Classifieds
Weather
Find it
News Alerts
NWS Yuma - Fair
68°F
Fair and 68°F
Winds From the Northeast at 3 MPH
Last Update: December 4, 2008 - 5:20PM
ADVERTISEMENT 
Event Calendar
Road Work
Gas Prices
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Horoscopes
Black Friday Poll
Did you shop on Black Friday?
Yes
No
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site