Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

What is long-term fire district cost?

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

The understanding about this supposed fire district in the Foothills is that it will cost $1.22 on the hundred of home valuations. That is a big savings compared to Rural/Metro cost and supposed to include the start up cost and for initial cost of equipment. But what will be the real cost to maintain such a fire district on a yearly basis?
 
With big growth in population in different counties of Arizona, did you know that statewide property tax levies for fire districts climbed 26 percent or $45.3 million from 2006 to 2007? Despite skyrocketing property valuations, the majority of fire districts in Arizona failed to reduce their tax rate in 2007.
 
The following are just a few of the fire districts with percentage raises that are established - Fort Valley Fire District in Coconino County had a 140 percent increase and held a 2.5 tax rate from 2006 to 2007; Peeples Valley Fire Department in Yavapai County had an 88 percent even though they decreased their tax rate 0.13 percent; Arizona City in Pinal County, 64 percent; Bullhead City Fire Department in Mohave County 50 percent; Green Valley Fire Department in Pima County, 44 percent. Without commensurate drop in the tax rate, these increases were driven by the growth in property values.
 
Unlike counties, cities and community colleges, the operational levies for fire districts are not limited. The only limitation on operational levies of a fire district is a maximum tax rate cap of $3.25. Primary levy limitation that applies to the operational levies for the above mentioned taxing jurisdictions require those entities to offset the increase in property values by adjusting the tax rates downward.
 
In the long run, are we going to save on a new fire district? What worries me is the "operational levies for fire district are not limited." And the "majority of fire districts failed to reduce their tax rate in 2007."
 
Makes you think twice if this new fire district is worth it and how long will that $1.22 on the hundred is going to last. What high percentage raise rate would we be looking at with no "limitations" or does Rural/Metro sound better to your pocketbook? It does me.


--
MIKE CURRAN
Foothills


See archived 'Opinion' Stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


Jobs
Cars
Real Estate
Rentals
Classifieds
Weather
Find it
News Alerts
NWS Yuma - Fair
88°F
Fair and 88°F
Winds From the Northwest at 6 MPH
Last Update: August 20, 2008 - 2:20AM
ADVERTISEMENT 
Event Calendar
Road Work
Gas Prices
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish Your Stuff
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
Lottery
Horoscopes
Gas Poll
Do you pay cash at the pump to avoid extra charges?
Yes
No
No charge at my station
Don't drive
Enter The Code To Vote
 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site