Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size

Other Articles in this Category

  • 2 hours 42 minutes ago
  • 2 hours 44 minutes ago
  • 2 hours 45 minutes ago
  • 2 hours 47 minutes ago
  • What is this?

    Save & Share this Article

    Military agreement ignored by media

    Comments 0 | Recommend 0

    It is very troubling to me that in a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.
     
    The agreement, defined as a Civil Assistance Plan, was not submitted to Congress for approval, nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms to civil riots.
     
    The military Civil Assistance Plan can be seen as a further incremental step being taken toward creating a North American armed forces available to be deployed in domestic North American emergency situations and in my mind civil unrest when they implement the North American Union.
     
    They are fully aware the peoples of all of these nations will not accept it without rioting in the streets. It is not just American citizens who do not want this merger but citizens from all three countries.
     
    In May 2007, President Bush, on his own authority, signed National Security Presidential Directive 51, also known as Homeland Security Presidential Directive 20, authorizing the president to declare a national emergency and take over all functions of federal, state, local, territorial and tribal governments, without necessarily obtaining the approval of Congress to do so.
     
    So here he goes again bypassing Congress and the people in his quest for complete unheard of power in this United States.
     
    If the establishment was really supportive of protecting U.S. national sovereignty why on earth would they allow this agreement?
     
    There is no question that the U.S. government is preparing for martial law domestically, but the long-term goal is to establish a martial law apparatus for all of North America. They are merely beginning the implementation of what has been announced in the Vision 2020 document.
     
    There is little question that this deal between the U.S. and Canadian military is another step toward forming a North American Union that is ruled by a militarized police state.


    --
    BRIAN O'FARRELL
    Yuma


    See archived 'Opinion' stories »
     


    Reader Comments
    From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

    We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


    Weather
    Find it
    News Alerts
    NWS Yuma - Fair
    110.0°F
    Fair and 110.0°F
    Winds West at 10.4 MPH (9 KT)
    Last Update: July 5, 2009 - 6:20PM
    ADVERTISEMENT 
    Event Calendar
    Featured Events

     
    • Find an Event
    Publish Your Stuff
    ADVERTISEMENT 
    Poll
    Lottery
    Horoscopes
    Vacation Poll
    Will you be taking a vacation this summer?
    Yes
    No
    Maybe
    Enter The Code To Vote
     
    powered by
    google
    Search
            Search: Web    Site